top of page
Search

Learning from Civil Rights Activists is Good for Business


ree

A child found a dying sea star in Puget Sound and nursed it back to health. "How does it matter if we save one when millions are dying?" her parent asked. "It matters to this one," she replied as she released it back into the ocean.


The sea star died a week later from pesticide poisoning. The entire population went extinct from microplastics within five years.


You can't solve systemic problems with individual solutions.


Here's the business version of the same story: Success gurus promise increased margins if you follow their proven formula. Meanwhile, wealth concentrates among those with capital and connections while small businesses following that exact advice struggle to survive. The formula isn't broken; it's working perfectly for those who designed it.


Wealth inequality operates at scales that individual optimization can't touch. Yet business advice keeps treating structural problems as personal challenges. Work harder! Network better! Think positive! It's like telling someone to swim faster while the current drags them out to sea.


In the 1960s, two approaches toward change emerged. Corporate America relied on rigid, one-size-fits-all formulas. Civil rights organizers developed adaptive frameworks using collective strategies.


Corporate America chose self-help. "Human relations" training promised that individual skill development would fix workplace dynamics. Fix the individuals, fix the system. This spawned decades of flavor-of-the-day business strategies - from "excellence" programs to "synergy" workshops to "disruption" methodologies. Each promised breakthrough results. Each delivered mixed outcomes at best.


The numbers tell the story: while corporate training spending hit $300+ billion annually, the wealth gap exploded. In the U.S., The top 1% now controls 32% of total wealth - up from 23% in 1989. Small businesses, following the same success formulas as billionaires, fail at rates approaching 50% within five years. The individual optimization industry has thrived while actual prosperity becomes more concentrated than ever.


Ella Baker understood something corporate trainers missed: effective change requires both individual development and collective action. Her approach focused on 'developing people who would speak for themselves' - building individual capacity while creating collective power. Instead of choosing between charismatic leadership or faceless committees, she developed both personal skills and shared decision-making processes. Individual brilliance was not enough because the problem was bigger than any one person could solve.


Joyce Ladner experienced this adaptive framework firsthand through what she called a community-wide mentorship ecosystem. "We had teachers who viewed us as their successors," Ladner explained. "They were preparing us... We're teaching you so that you can one day come back and teach or be whatever you want to be." This wasn't individual career mentorship but multi-generational knowledge transfer where the entire community invested in developing collective leadership. Young people were taught to actively build networks with "like-minded people" who shared their commitment to change, creating distributed authority and shared learning rather than dependence on single experts. This mentorship system developed the human infrastructure needed for sustained organizing while preserving cultural knowledge - an adaptive community solution that built both individual capacity and collective power.


The collective approach extended to life-threatening situations that individual preparation couldn't address. Joyce Ladner described the routine reality of organizing work: "I've been in cars driven by civil rights workers, by guys who had to outrun a local police officer. Because you couldn't stop. If you stopped, they could kill you... They always had us sit in the backseat of the car because if a bullet came, they wanted to be the first to take the bullet for us." When threats are systemic - like racist violence targeting anyone involved in organizing - individual self-defense becomes inadequate. The seating arrangement represented sophisticated collective strategy: protecting the most indispensable members while maintaining the community's capacity to continue organizing work. These protection practices emerged from shared experience and collective learning, creating interdependent safety systems that strengthened rather than competed with individual capacity.


Organizers developed what business consultants still lack: adaptive frameworks that match individual and collective solutions to the right problems. You can't end segregation through personal development. You can't overcome economic oppression through individual entrepreneurship. The system itself has to change.


Today's small business owner follows growth formulas while competing against companies with tax loopholes and capital access. The fatal flaw remains: Individual optimization can't level a structurally tilted playing field.


Instead of asking "How do I succeed within this system?" ask "How do I navigate this system while building collective power for change?" A struggling restaurant owner can't wait for antitrust reform to pay next month's rent, but they can join local business associations pushing for fair delivery app fees while also optimizing their current operations. The key is doing both: individual tactics for immediate survival and collective action for long-term change. Civil rights organizers understood this: they developed personal safety strategies while building movements to eliminate the need for those strategies. You can't abandon individual solutions when your business is hemorrhaging money, but you can recognize that your individual struggle is part of a systemic pattern. Work the system that exists today while building the system you need tomorrow.


Understanding this nuance could save you from nursing a dying sea star while the ocean becomes uninhabitable.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page